USPTO serial 79095795
VERSACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4626622Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 28, 2014
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERSACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GIANNI VERSACE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GIANNI VERSACE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GIANNI VERSACE S.R.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VERSACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 1, 2020 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 4, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |