Drawing for PFEIFFER CONSULTING

USPTO serial 79095806

PFEIFFER CONSULTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4089584Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2012
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PFEIFFER CONSULTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Bookkeeping in the field of the distribution of cosmetic products; organization of fairs and exhibitions for commercial and advertising purposes in the field of cosmetic products and the cosmetic industry; business organization consultancy in the field of cosmetic products and the cosmetic industry; outsourcing services in the field of cosmetic products and the cosmetic industryACTIVE
041Vocational guidance on cosmetic products, namely, in the fields of product development, production, safety, quality, certification, good manufacturing practice, legal requirementsACTIVE
042Design and development of computer hardware and software in the field of cosmetic products; consultancy with regard to the design of homepages and Internet pages relating to cosmetic productsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 21, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 21, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 14, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 21, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 18, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 24, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 14, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 12, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 2, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 20, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 20, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 24, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 24, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 22, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 28, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 6, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 6, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 6, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 28, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance