Drawing for GODZEUS

USPTO serial 79095866

GODZEUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4284331Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 5, 2013
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GODZEUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES M SLATTERY

JAMES M SLATTERY Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP8110 Gatehouse Road, Suite 100 EastFalls Church, VA 22042UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Games, namely, action target games, arcade games, dart games; electromation playing cars, namely, toy cars, model cars, remote control toys in the nature of cars; toys, namely, disc toss toys, electronic action toys; board games; balls for games; body-training apparatus; dumb-bells; appliances for gymnastics, namely,gymnastic horizontal bars, parallel bars, jungle gyms; fishing tackleSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 3, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 11, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jun 11, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 6, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 6, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 2, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 6, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 6, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 5, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 24, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 31, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 31, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 9, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 9, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 10, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Mar 10, 2012PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Mar 7, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Feb 29, 2012PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 29, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 30, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 28, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 9, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 9, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 7, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 28, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance