Drawing for DACROBLACK

USPTO serial 79095927

DACROBLACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DACROBLACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Smith

Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products used in industry and science; industrial adhesives; galvanizing baths; degreasing preparations for use in manufacturing processes; chemical compounds for corrosion-resistant coatings for use on metallic substratesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
002Anti-corrosive preparations; paints, varnishes, lacquers, paints, rust-protection agents; anti-rust oils; protective preparations for metals; corrosion-resistant adhesive coatings for use on metallic substratesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
004Lubricants; industrial oilsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
006Base metals and their alloysSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
040Information on metal processing, metal cladding, treatment of materialsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 4, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 29, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 25, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 2, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 2, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 30, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 28, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance