USPTO serial 79096046
LEENLIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEENLIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 S JACKSON STREETSUITE 200GLENDALE, CA 91205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Unsaturated fatty acids and their esters for food; oils for food, namely, borage seed oil, pumpkin seed oil, black currant seed oil, sundrop oil, almond oil, coconut oil, soya oil, flaxseed oil, peanut oil, sunflower oil, rapeseed oil, sprouted cereal oil, fish oil | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | Edible chewing products for animals, namely, cattle feed; Food agents for cattle, namely, cattle feed; Non-medicated animal feed additives; Nutritional feed additives for both monogastric and multi-chambered stomached animals, birds and domestic animals; flaxseed flour; Non-medicinal animal feed additives; Pet food; cat food; dog food; bird food; domestic animal feed; Animal proteins, dog biscuits, bird (seed) food | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 31, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |