Drawing for BIBLICAL JERUSALEM BITTER

USPTO serial 79096148

BIBLICAL JERUSALEM BITTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4113549Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 20, 2012
Examiner
GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIBLICAL JERUSALEM BITTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tamar Niv Bessinger

Tamar Niv Bessinger FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42nd St., 17 Fl.NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional additives for medical purposes for use in foods and dietary supplements for human consumption; Nutritional food additives for medical purposes in the nature of natural food extracts derived from herbsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
033Alcoholic beverages containing herbal extracts, namely, alcoholic bitterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 27, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 20, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 6, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 9, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 6, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 20, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 31, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 17, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 27, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 27, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 20, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 20, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 3, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 14, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 11, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 11, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 11, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 5, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance