Drawing for R-FLUTE

USPTO serial 79096216

R-FLUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4137394Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2012
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with R-FLUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur J. DeBaugh

Arthur J. DeBaugh Bell, Davis & Pitt, P.A.100 N. Cherry StreetSuite 600Winston-Salem, NC 27101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Corrugated card and cardboard; cardboard; cardboard packagingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
017Plastic composite material in the form of boards and sheets for use in manufacturing and as packagingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 14, 2022FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 19, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 30, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 6, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 14, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 14, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 8, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 8, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 19, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 12, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 12, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance