USPTO serial 79096274
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard P. Georget, Esq.
244 Fifth AvenueSuite 2325New York, NY 10001| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toilet waters; parfum; soaps; cosmetics and non-medicated skin care preparations, including for decorative purposes, in particular fragrances, ethereal essences, non-medicated skin care preparations, skin cleansing preparations, day creams being skin creams and night creams, beauty masks and face care concentrates in the nature of non-medicated beauty serums for use on the face, lipsticks, nail polishes, eye shadows, mascara, make-up, camouflage creams being concealers for the face and body, shower gels, body lotions, body creams, massage creams, depilatories; cosmetic sun care preparations, in particular sun creams, sun milks and after sun lotions | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 20, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |