Drawing for LITERNITY

USPTO serial 79096277

LITERNITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4140741Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2012
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITERNITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alix C. Rosenbaum

Alix C. Rosenbaum Miller Nash LLP111 S.W. Fifth AvenueSuite 3400Portland, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Organic light-emitting diodes; consumer electronic devices used with an external display screen or monitors, namely, personal computers, tablet computers, telephones, MP3 players, DVD players; compact disc players, televisions, video cameras, navigation apparatus; computer hardware, namely, computer monitors and screens used for consumer electronic devices; electronic displays operated with organic light-emitting diodes used for electronic signageSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations, lighting fixtures, electric lamps, wall lamps, floor lamps, ceiling lamps, desk lamps, table lamps, pocket lamps, lighting installations with organic light-emitting diodes, illuminating signs, automotive interior and exterior lights for illuminating purposes and automotive headlamps, and organic light emitting diode assemblies for street lightsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Research product development and design in the field of organic light-emitting diodes, lighting apparatus and of goods operating with organic light-emitting diodes; technical project planning and consultancy in the field of organic light-emitting diodes; technical research in the field of lighting and illumination of objects and spacesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 25, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 30, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 6, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 21, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 21, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 15, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 9, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 20, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 20, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 15, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 20, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 18, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 18, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 23, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2011RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 23, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 23, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 20, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 12, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance