Drawing for ZONEBOND

USPTO serial 79096291

ZONEBOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4362689Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 9, 2013
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ZONEBOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Jaffe

Michael A. Jaffe RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 Euclid Ave.Floor 19Cleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Semiconductor wafer processing machines and equipmentACTIVE
009Computer software for use in processing equipment for processing semiconductor wafersACTIVE
042Technical consulting services in the field of the design of semiconductor wafer processing machines and equipment and computer software for use in processing equipment for processing semiconductor wafersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 27, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 23, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 6, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 4, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 29, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 3, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 3, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 31, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 29, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 21, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 21, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 9, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 9, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 22, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 23, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 16, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 11, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 8, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 4, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 17, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 14, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 22, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 8, 2012CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 8, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 7, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Mar 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 6, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 9, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 17, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 12, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance