Drawing for ZONEBOND

USPTO serial 79096291

ZONEBOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4362689Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 9, 2013
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ZONEBOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Jaffe

Michael A. Jaffe RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 Euclid Ave.Floor 19Cleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Semiconductor wafer processing machines and equipmentACTIVE—
009Computer software for use in processing equipment for processing semiconductor wafersACTIVE—
042Technical consulting services in the field of the design of semiconductor wafer processing machines and equipment and computer software for use in processing equipment for processing semiconductor wafersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 23, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 29, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 3, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 31, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 29, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 21, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 9, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 22, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 4, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 8, 2012CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Mar 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 9, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 12, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance