USPTO serial 79096309
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arlene D. Hanks
Arlene D. Hanks Moore & Van Allen PLLC3015 Carrington Mill BoulevardSuite 400Morrisville, NC 27560| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Cellulose based cloths for absorption of liquids for medical purposes, namely, medical and surgical dressings and plasters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Cellulose based cloths for surgical use for protection of equipment and furniture by absorption of liquids, namely, surgical cloths for use in covering surgical equipment, apparatus and furniture | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Cellulose based cloths for absorption of liquids, namely, cellulose wipes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |