Drawing for RELEVO

USPTO serial 79096309

RELEVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4162865Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2012
Examiner
BURNS, ELLEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELEVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlene D. Hanks

Arlene D. Hanks Moore & Van Allen PLLC3015 Carrington Mill BoulevardSuite 400Morrisville, NC 27560

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Cellulose based cloths for absorption of liquids for medical purposes, namely, medical and surgical dressings and plastersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
010Cellulose based cloths for surgical use for protection of equipment and furniture by absorption of liquids, namely, surgical cloths for use in covering surgical equipment, apparatus and furnitureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
016Cellulose based cloths for absorption of liquids, namely, cellulose wipesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 1, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 7, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Oct 7, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 1, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 1, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 14, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 26, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 26, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 4, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 8, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 8, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 1, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 1, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 1, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 30, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 17, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 12, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance