USPTO serial 79096350
PERFECTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFECTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PL-05-462 Wiazowna, PL
PL-05-462 Wiazowna, PL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
PAULO A DE ALMEIDA PATEL & ALMEIDA PC16830 VENTURA BLVDSUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; skincare products for face and body, namely, creams, lotions, facial masks, facial toners, facial milks, facial micellar water, facial and body scrubs, skincare oils, facial gels, body butters, depilation waxes and creams, eye patches containing moisturizer, oil-blotting papers; hair care products, namely, hair care preparations, lotions, creams, oils, masks, conditioners and sprays | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 1, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 1, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 21, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |