Drawing for MARDO

USPTO serial 79096585

MARDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4192421Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2012
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MARDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert EGBERT, MCDANIEL & SWARTZ, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030[ Coffee, cocoa, artificial coffee, mocha coffee, vegetal preparations for use as coffee substitutes, cocoa-based beverages, coffee-based beverages; tapioca, sago; noodles, macaroni, ravioli; bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; pastries; flour-based products, namely, chips, pasta, dough products, namely, biscuits, waffles, crackers, desserts made of flour, namely, bakery desserts; ice cream cakes, tarts, ready cake mixes, pizza dough, cake dough, bread dough, bread, pizzas, sandwiches; dough desserts made with milk, namely, dough-enrobed foods consisting of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of ice cream and other dairy-based desserts; puddings, namely, crème caramel, custards, asure, namely, a kind of Turkish-style fruit and nut dessert pudding; honey, royal jelly for human consumption, not for medical purposes, propolis for human consumption; molasses syrup for food; flour for food, processed semolina, food starches; teas, ice teas, herbal tea, other than for medicinal use; candies, Turkish delight, halvah, pismaniye, namely, a kind of Turkish-style cotton candy, frozen yogurt confectionery, chocolates, chocolate products, namely, chocolate chips, chocolate and sugar covered products, namely, sugar-coated almonds, chocolate and confectionery for decorating Christmas trees, chocolate based beverages with milk; chewing gums not for medical purposes; ice, ] ice creams [, edible fruit ices; salt; rice, bulgur, namely, a kind of Turkish-style boiled and pounded wheat; cereals and cereal products, namely, breakfast cereals; cereal based snack foods made from corn flakes, cereal based snack foods made from oatmeal; granulated sugar, cube sugar, powdered sugar ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 24, 2023XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2023XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 18, 2023INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 19, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 13, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 7, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 6, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 21, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 5, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Mar 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 13, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 4, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 14, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 14, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 20, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 19, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance