USPTO serial 79096715
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NETZSCH Trockenmahltechnik GmbH
Haunau, DE
Netzsch-Condux Mahltechnik GmbH
95100 Selb, DE
Netzsch-Condux Mahltechnik GmbH
95100 Selb, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeanne Hamburg
Jeanne Hamburg Norris McLaughlin, P.A.7 Times Square, 21st FloorNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrical and mechanical comminution and cutting machines for industrial purposes, with rotating and stationary knives in particular for the processing of cellulose and plastic | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 27, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |