USPTO serial 79096863
CONPASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4299686Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 12, 2013
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONPASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nauchno-proizvodstvennoe chastnoe unitarnoe predpriyatie "ADANI"
BY
Other trademarks owned by Nauchno-proizvodstvennoe chastnoe unitarnoe predpriyatie "ADANI"
Nauchno-proizvodstvennoe chastnoe unitarnoe predpriyatie "ADANI"
BY
Other trademarks owned by Nauchno-proizvodstvennoe chastnoe unitarnoe predpriyatie "ADANI"
Nauchno-proizvodstvennoe chastnoe unitarnoe predpriyatie "ADANI"
BY
Other trademarks owned by Nauchno-proizvodstvennoe chastnoe unitarnoe predpriyatie "ADANI"
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | X-ray security and inspection systems, namely, scanners, radiation detection devices, image processing devices; Full- body personnel security screening systems, namely, scanners, radiation detection devices, image processing devices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nauchno-proizvodstvennoe chastnoe unitarnoe predpriyatie "ADANI"
- Other trademarks owned by Nauchno-proizvodstvennoe chastnoe unitarnoe predpriyatie "ADANI"
- Other trademarks owned by Nauchno-proizvodstvennoe chastnoe unitarnoe predpriyatie "ADANI"
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CONPASS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 25, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |