USPTO serial 79096926
Serial No. 79096926
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4181275Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2012
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79096926?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer programming; computer software design; updating of computer software; rental of computer software; maintenance of computer software; duplication of computer programs; hosting computer web sites; installation of computer software; computer software consultancy | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | FINA | FINAL DISPOSITION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |