Drawing for BODYTEC

USPTO serial 79096949

BODYTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BODYTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, bottoms, tops, sweaters, socks, belts, sports belts incorporating a bottle holder, ski wear, and foul weather gear, including coats, gloves and scarves; footwear; headwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 28, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 21, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 19, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 23, 2013IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 27, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 27, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 9, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 17, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 31, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 31, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 27, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 27, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 6, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 9, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 10, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 9, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 3, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 3, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 2, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 26, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance