USPTO serial 79096949
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, bottoms, tops, sweaters, socks, belts, sports belts incorporating a bottle holder, ski wear, and foul weather gear, including coats, gloves and scarves; footwear; headwear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |