Drawing for WIREFLEX

USPTO serial 79097000

WIREFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4270213Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 8, 2013
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIREFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin W. Schiffmiller

Martin W. Schiffmiller Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieroni, P.C.425 Fifth Avenue, 5th Floor, Suite 501New York, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006[ Common metals and their alloys; buildings, transportable, of metal; railway materials of metal in the nature of metal railway points; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; ironmongery and small items of metal hardware, namely, metal screws and bolts ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
007Machines and machine tools, namely, vacuum cleaners and air condensers and their tubes, being part of vehicle engines; vacuum cleaner components of metal or not, including metal parts; flexible tubes, not of metal, for compact vacuum cleaners, central vacuuming systems for vacuuming comprised of vacuum cleaners; vacuum cleaners for garages and for photocopiers; portable vacuum cleaners; industrial vacuum cleaners for dry and liquid materials; vacuum cleaners for cars; automobile washing unit accessories in the nature of machines for washing the exterior surface of an automobile vehicle and vacuuming the interior of such vehicle, where the equipment is manually-operated by the user; vacuum cleaners for commercial use, also for use in hotels and offices; scouring machines; dust-removing installations used for cleaning in the nature of vacuum cleaners, dust-removing machines whether portable or not, for industrial use in the nature of vacuum cleaners; vacuum cleaner hosesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 3, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 9, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 9, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 19, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 19, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Feb 19, 201971.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Feb 19, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 8, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 7, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Aug 1, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jul 31, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 31, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 9, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 9, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 8, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 8, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 4, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 23, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 23, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2012ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 7, 2012LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
May 11, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 18, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 4, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 13, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 10, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 2, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance