Drawing for T-SHIRT COUTURE

USPTO serial 79097045

T-SHIRT COUTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T-SHIRT COUTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G. Franklin Rothwell Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc1425 K Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, FOOTWEAR AND HEADGEAR, NAMELY, SHIRTS, EXCLUDING T-SHIRTS, DRESSES, GOWNS, COATS, JACKETS, PANTS, JEANS, SKIRTS, SHAWLS, SWEATERS, SHOES AND HATSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 24, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 14, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 26, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 26, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 26, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 7, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 7, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 3, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 18, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 6, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 6, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 7, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 2, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance