USPTO serial 79097369
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus
AIMEE L. KAPLAN & STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, confectionery made of sugar and chocolate, chocolate candies and chocolate truffles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |