USPTO serial 79097426
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SK-972 01 Bojnice, SK
SK-972 01 Bojnice, SK
SK-972 01 Bojnice, SK
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell T. Manning
Russell T. Manning Marsh Fischmann & Breyfogle LLP8055 E. Tufts Ave, Ste 450Denver, CO 80237UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Pumps as parts for machines, engines or motors; pumps being machines, namely, pumps for use in oil and gas drilling and production; pump diaphragms; mechanical and pneumatic conveyors; steam/oil separating machines, devices, and filters, namely, vertical, horizontal, and spherical separators; machine control cables; extracting machines for mines; oil refining machines; separating machines, devices, and filters, namely, oil and gas separators; mechanical controllers and control mechanisms, namely, hydraulic and pneumatic controllers for machines, engines or motors | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations, namely, electronic controllers for machines, engines and motors; electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; measuring instruments for use in industrial operations, namely, flow meters and pressure meters; computers; computer peripheral devices; computer programs and software for use in industrial processes and controls; data processing apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Analysis for oil-field exploitation; installation of computer software; oil-well testing; computer system design; computer programming; updating of computer software; duplication of computer programs; computer consultation; computer software consultancy; underwater exploration; oil-field surveying; oil prospecting; oil-field surveys; computer systems analysis; computer software design | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 30, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 1, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |