Drawing for NAFTAMATIKA OIL AUTOMATION WELL SIM

USPTO serial 79097426

NAFTAMATIKA OIL AUTOMATION WELL SIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4266119Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 1, 2013
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAFTAMATIKA OIL AUTOMATION WELL SIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Russell T. Manning

Russell T. Manning Marsh Fischmann & Breyfogle LLP8055 E. Tufts Ave, Ste 450Denver, CO 80237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pumps as parts for machines, engines or motors; pumps being machines, namely, pumps for use in oil and gas drilling and production; pump diaphragms; mechanical and pneumatic conveyors; steam/oil separating machines, devices, and filters, namely, vertical, horizontal, and spherical separators; machine control cables; extracting machines for mines; oil refining machines; separating machines, devices, and filters, namely, oil and gas separators; mechanical controllers and control mechanisms, namely, hydraulic and pneumatic controllers for machines, engines or motorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations, namely, electronic controllers for machines, engines and motors; electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; measuring instruments for use in industrial operations, namely, flow meters and pressure meters; computers; computer peripheral devices; computer programs and software for use in industrial processes and controls; data processing apparatusSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Analysis for oil-field exploitation; installation of computer software; oil-well testing; computer system design; computer programming; updating of computer software; duplication of computer programs; computer consultation; computer software consultancy; underwater exploration; oil-field surveying; oil prospecting; oil-field surveys; computer systems analysis; computer software designSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 30, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 30, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Apr 2, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 2, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 1, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 19, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 22, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 3, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 1, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 1, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 16, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 16, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 26, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 26, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 26, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 4, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 4, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 4, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 4, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 21, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 20, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 20, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 29, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 29, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 1, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 1, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 1, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 30, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 14, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 9, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance