USPTO serial 79097494
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cecelia Perry
Cecelia Perry MCGLEW AND TUTTLE, P.C.SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automatically operated apparatus for dosing, sorting and decanting of flowable and pourable liquid and pasty products; control apparatus in the nature of hydraulic controls and pneumatic controls for machines, engines and motors | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Scientific, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling and checking and supervision apparatus and instruments, namely, cables for optical signal transmission, optical character readers, weighing instruments and apparatus, distance measuring apparatus, coordinate measuring apparatus in the nature of coordinate measuring machines, digital signal processors, and technical measuring, testing and checking apparatus and instruments for measuring, testing and checking the temperature, pressure, quality and concentration of gas and liquids; weighing machines; mechanical dosage dispensers in the nature of dispenser of preset portions of fluid, solid granules, paste and powder for dosing purposes, all not for medial use; distribution boxes for electrical power and switch boxes; casings and casing parts for electrical equipment, namely, housing for switching apparatus; Computer hardware; peripheral component interface (PCI) hardware; UPI (universal peripheral interface) hardware; computer hardware and computer software both of which are for controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating and documenting industrial processes and courses of manufacture; peripheral component interface (PCI) hardware, UPI (universal peripheral interface) hardware and UPI (universal peripheral interface) software all of which are for controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating and documenting industrial processes and courses of manufacture; computer hardware and computer software both of which are for controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating and documenting dosing, weighing and decanting processes; peripheral component interface (PCI) hardware, UPI (universal peripheral interface) hardware, and UPI (universal peripheral interface) software all of which are for controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating and documenting dosing, weighing and decanting processes; Computer hardware for identification devices being encodable with machine-readable codes and for radio frequency identification devices (RFID), including those for the purpose of batch tracking and for receiving, processing, transmitting and displaying data; Computer software for batch tracking, encryption, encoding, wireless content delivery, receiving, processing, transmitting and displaying data in machine-readable encodable devices and radio frequency identification devices (RFID); peripheral component interface (PCI) hardware for identification devices being encodable with machine-readable codes and for radio frequency identification devices (RFID), including those for the purpose of batch tracking and for receiving, processing, transmitting and displaying data; UPI (universal peripheral interface) hardware for identification devices being encodable with machine-readable codes and for radio frequency identification devices (RFID), including those for the purpose of batch tracking and for receiving, processing, transmitting and displaying data; UPI (universal peripheral interface) software for batch tracking, encryption, encoding, wireless content delivery, receiving, processing, transmitting and displaying data in machine-readable encodable devices and radio frequency identification devices (RFID); encoders; code reading devices in the nature of magnetic coded card readers and bar code readers, radio frequency identification devices (RFID), namely, RFID transponders, RFID reading devices and RFID encoders; casings and casing parts for electrical equipment, namely, housing for distribution boxes and switch cabinets; automatically operated apparatus for weighing of flowable and pourable liquid and pasty products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware and software consultancy in the field of controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating, documenting and operating industrial processes and courses of manufacture as well as in the field of controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating, documenting and operating dosing, weighing and decanting processes; computer systems analysis, namely, computer systems control and computer systems analysis regarding regulating systems analysis in the field of controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating, documenting and operating industrial processes and courses of manufacture as well as in the field of controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating, documenting and operating dosing, weighing and decanting processes; computer programming, namely, programming of computer animations in the field of controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating, documenting and operating industrial processes and courses of manufacture as well as in the field of controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating, documenting and operating dosing, weighing and decanting processes; design and development of computer software and of data processing computer software systems in the field of controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating, documenting and operating industrial processes and courses of manufacture as well as in the field of controlling, regulating, optimizing, monitoring, simulating, documenting and operating dosing, weighing and decanting processes; planning, design and development of new products for others, namely, of distribution boxes and switch cabinets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 26, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 4, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |