Drawing for SLEEK

USPTO serial 79097555

SLEEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLEEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; shampoos; javelle water; stain removers; creams for leather; emery cloth; essential oils; adhesives for affixing false hair; dentifrices; shampoos for petsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing; clothing for children; swimsuits; raincoats; shoes; hats; hosiery; gloves (clothing); scarfs; girdlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Bill-posting; layout services for advertising purposes; publicity; business management assistance; sales promotion for others; personnel management consultancy; relocation services for businesses; document reproduction; rental of vending machines; accountingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 11, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 22, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 2, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance