USPTO serial 79097555
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; shampoos; javelle water; stain removers; creams for leather; emery cloth; essential oils; adhesives for affixing false hair; dentifrices; shampoos for pets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing; clothing for children; swimsuits; raincoats; shoes; hats; hosiery; gloves (clothing); scarfs; girdles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Bill-posting; layout services for advertising purposes; publicity; business management assistance; sales promotion for others; personnel management consultancy; relocation services for businesses; document reproduction; rental of vending machines; accounting | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |