Drawing for BECKER NOZZLE

USPTO serial 79097796

BECKER NOZZLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4319324Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 16, 2013
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BECKER NOZZLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott W. Kelley

Scott W. Kelley KELLY & KELLEY, LLP6320 CANOGA AVENUESUITE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Drive gears for marine, coastal and inland waterway vesselsACTIVE
012Marine installations and devices, namely, maneuvering installations in the nature of steering gears, rudders, steerable propeller nozzles, and steerable ducted propellers; rudders with twisted rudder blades, balance profile rudders, full-spade rudders, semi-spade rudders, KSR (King Support Rudder) rudders with or without articulated fins, rudder blades with propulsion bulbs, steering nozzles, Kort nozzles, Kort steering nozzles, bow thrusters, screw propellers, propeller nozzles, namely, ducted propellers that are turnable or steerable, transverse thrusters for marine vehicles, guide devices in the nature of ducts, fins and hydrofoils forward of a propeller for controlling the incoming propeller flow for ships; and ducted propellers, namely, propellers fitted with a non-rotating nozzle for controlling the incoming propeller flow for shipsACTIVE
042Engineering, research and development, in particular design and conducting calculations of hydrodynamic properties of propeller nozzles, ducted propellers, steering nozzles and Kort nozzles; providing of technical expertise in the nautical field; project research, in particular conducting studies and investigations for the development of vehicular steering technology designs on models and/or vessels, innovation research, namely, development of steering technology elements and drafting of engineering construction documentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Feb 25, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 25, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Oct 25, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 16, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 1, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 7, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 7, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 15, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2018PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Aug 10, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 24, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 31, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 19, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 19, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 16, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 16, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 29, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 29, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 9, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 9, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 21, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 20, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 29, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 31, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 14, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Sep 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 9, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 29, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 29, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 28, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 28, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 24, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 23, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance