USPTO serial 79097812
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arlene D. Hanks
Arlene D. Hanks Moore & Van Allen PLLC100 North Tryon StreetSuite 4700Charlotte, NC 28202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [ Advertising services; business management; business administration and management; providing office functions; computer file management; ] business consulting and management in the field of clinical trials, namely, providing information management services; business consulting and management in the field of clinical trials, namely, management and compilation of computerized databases in the field of clinical trials for business purposes; providing independent review of clinical trials for business purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services in the field of medical devices and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services in the field of medical devices; design and development of computer hardware and software; [ medical laboratories services; providing medical and scientific research information in the field of clinical trials; medical research; ] medical and scientific research, namely, conducting clinical trials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | [ Medical services; ] medical analysis, namely, review of medical records for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes [ performing diagnosis of diseases; medical advice related to physical health ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 2, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 15, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 12, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |