USPTO serial 79098582
DER SCHARFE MAXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4169733Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2012
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DER SCHARFE MAXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence Apolzon
Lawrence Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese, namely, semi-hard cheese | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |