Drawing for DOUBLE-H

USPTO serial 79098875

DOUBLE-H

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE-H?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Braking systems for motorcycles and motor land vehicles; parts and fittings for all the aforesaidSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 14, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 31, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2012GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 10, 2012GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
May 10, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 10, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 10, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 27, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance