USPTO serial 79098875
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Braking systems for motorcycles and motor land vehicles; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 14, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 31, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2012 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |