USPTO serial 79098943
CHATEAU PAVIE MACQUIN SAINT EMILION GRAND CRU CLASSÉ SAINT-EMILION GRAND CRU APPELLATION SAINT-EMILION GRAND CRU CONTR0LE S.C.E.A. CHATEAU PAVIE MACQUIN PROPRIETAIRE A ST-EMILION 33330 FRANCE MIS EN BOUTEILLE AU CHATEAU PRODUCE OF FRANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHATEAU PAVIE MACQUIN SAINT EMILION GRAND CRU CLASSÉ SAINT-EMILION GRAND CRU APPELLATION SAINT-EMILION GRAND CRU CONTR0LE S.C.E.A. CHATEAU PAVIE MACQUIN PROPRIETAIRE A ST-EMILION 33330 FRANCE MIS EN BOUTEILLE AU CHATEAU PRODUCE OF FRANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | AOC wines, namely, wines with protected appellation of origin, from the wine-making estate called Château Pavie Macquin | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCEA CHATEAU PAVIE MACQUIN SCEA
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CHATEAU PAVIE MACQUIN SAINT EMILION GRAND CRU CLASSÉ SAINT-EMILION GRAND CRU APPELLATION SAINT-EMILION GRAND CRU CONTR0LE S.C.E.A. CHATEAU PAVIE MACQUIN PROPRIETAIRE A ST-EMILION 33330 FRANCE MIS EN BOUTEILLE AU CHATEAU PRODUCE OF FRANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |