Drawing for GREEN BLOCKING TECHNO

USPTO serial 79099071

GREEN BLOCKING TECHNO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4204062Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 11, 2012
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN BLOCKING TECHNO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Machining, sizing, cutting, grinding, edging, bevelling, feather edging, edging with a groove, chamfering, drilling, finishing, smoothing, polishing, fine reworking and stripping of spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses; treatment and coating of spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses; application of temporary adherent top layers and coatings to spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lensesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 14, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 12, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 12, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 12, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 12, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 8, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 11, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 13, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 12, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 11, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 1, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 11, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 26, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 6, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 6, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 10, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Mar 26, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 20, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 13, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 11, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 24, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 24, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 23, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 20, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 15, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 14, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance