USPTO serial 79099311
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
A-1060 Wien, AT
Other trademarks owned by Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
A-1060 Wien, AT
Other trademarks owned by Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
A-1060 Wien, AT
Other trademarks owned by Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hae Park-Suk
Hae Park-Suk Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.901 N. Glebe Road11th FloorArlington, VA 22203| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Machines, namely, machines for manufacturing and dispensing packing material, plastic flat foils, flat foil tapes of plastic; extrusion machines for the production of flat film tapes made of plastic; band stretching machines; bobbin winding machines; circular looms; coating machines for plastic fabrics and films; perforating machines for plastic fabrics and films; printing machines; manufacturing machines for cutting into lengths, folding, sewing up and welding plastic fabrics and films; machines for the production of bags; machines for the production of plastic fabric bags; bagging machines, namely, machines for filling, weighing and sealing bags; machines for processing plastic materials and plastic scraps; recycling machines for plastic materials; machines for crushing plastic scraps; machines for granulating plastic melts; machines for filtering plastic melts; machines for the heat treatment of plastic materials; machines for the solid-state polycondensation of plastic materials; intrusion machines ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Packaging material made of plastic, namely, synthetic plastic fabric bags and sacks for packaging; [ reusable packaging bags made of synthetic plastic fabrics comprised of flat foil tapes of plastic with or without a closed upper end; reusable packaging bags made of synthetic plastic fabrics comprised of flat foil tapes of plastic further coated with plastic films; ] pinch bottom bags for packaging made of synthetic plastic fabrics comprised of flat foil tapes of plastic and closed at the upper end by stitched seam; pinch bottom bags for packaging made of synthetic plastic fabrics comprised of flat foil tapes of plastic further coated with plastic films and closed at upper end by stitched seam; packaging bags made of a plastic fabric | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Bags made of a plastic fabric for the transport and storage of bulk goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 4, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |