Drawing for FILOSO FILLE LA MATIÈRE EST UNE IDÉE

USPTO serial 79099376

FILOSO FILLE LA MATIÈRE EST UNE IDÉE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4284339Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 5, 2013
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FILOSO FILLE LA MATIÈRE EST UNE IDÉE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. EGBERT

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC1314 TEXAS, 21ST FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soap; perfumery, essential oils; hair lotions, hair dyes and colorants; depilatory preparations; make-up removing preparations; beauty masks; shaving preparations; cosmetic sets primarily comprised of cosmetics; cosmetics, eyeshadow, lipsticks, rouge, foundation, mascara; false eyelashes and nails; adhesives for cosmetic purposes; adhesives for attaching false nails; decorative transfers for cosmetic purposes; temporary tattoos; mustache wax; nail care preparations; pumice stones for personal useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
008Hand-operated hand tools and implements, namely, cutlery; razors, scissors, hair cutting scissors, beard scissors; shearer hand instruments, namely, hand-operated shears; manicure articles and pedicure articles, namely, nail files, nail clippers, tweezers, nail nippers, cuticle tweezers, cuticle nippers, manicure scissors, nail scissors and cuticle scissors; electric manicure kits, namely, electric manicure sets; hair-removing tweezers, eyelash curlers; electric nail clippers; non-electric hand-held hair-curling apparatus, namely, non-electric hair curling irons; curling tongs, namely, non-electric curling irons; goffering irons, namely, hand tools in the nature of crimping irons; non-electric depilatory appliances; nail files for pedicure; razor cases; manicure kits primarily comprised of nail files; pedicure kits primarily comprised of nail filesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 10, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 11, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 10, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
May 6, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 6, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 5, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 22, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 6, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 6, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 5, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 18, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 31, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 31, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 31, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 17, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 23, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 22, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 22, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 25, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 21, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance