Drawing for RODICUT

USPTO serial 79099462

RODICUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4173507Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2012
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RODICUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Lee

Elizabeth Lee LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 Broad St., 21st FloorNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Die-cutting machines for corrugated cardboard accessories and replacements therefor, namely, rotating dies, strips of standard polyurethane and system anvilsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 3, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 3, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 3, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 17, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 4, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 13, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Aug 13, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Aug 6, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 17, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 27, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 15, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 17, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 17, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 1, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 27, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 8, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 22, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance