USPTO serial 79099505
WHITESTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHITESTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ballarini Paolo & Figli S.p.A.
Rivarolo Mantovano, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin W. Schiffmiller
MARTIN W SCHIFFMILLER KIRSCHSTEIN ISRAEL SCHIFFMILLER & PIERON425 FIFTH AVENUE5TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016-2223Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Pots, non-electric pressure cookers, saucepans, pans and other non-electric cooking containers for household use, namely, for the preservation and the cooking of food; pots with anti-adherent coating, non-electric pressure cookers with anti-adherent coating, saucepans with anti-adherent coating, pans and other non-electric cooking containers for household use with anti-adherent coating, namely, for the preservation and the cooking of food; pots with outside decorations and varnishing or outside painting, non-electric pressure cookers with outside decorations and varnishing or outside painting, saucepans with outside decorations and varnishing or outside painting, pans and other non-electric cooking containers for household use with outside decorations and varnishing or outside painting, namely, for the preservation and the cooking of food | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |