USPTO serial 79099748
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PIANORO (BO), IT
I-50031 BARBERINO DI MUGELLO (FI), IT
I-50031 BARBERINO DI MUGELLO (FI), IT
I-50031 BARBERINO DI MUGELLO (FI), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Alexander Nolte
N. Alexander Nolte Nolte Lackenbach Siegel111 Brook Street, Suite 101Scarsdale, NY 10583United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automatic machines and apparatus, all in the nature of packaging machines for the packaging of pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles; [ filling machines for pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles; selecting machines in the nature of machines for selecting articles for packaging, all for pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles; cartoning machines for pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles; capping machines for pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles; ] labeling machines in the nature of automatic industrial labeling machines for applying labels to articles, containers and bottles, all for pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles [ ; carton sealing machines, all for pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles; automatic machines and apparatuses, all in the nature of machines for making and assembling bottles and containers for receiving pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Microprocessors for packaging of pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles; microprocessors for [ filling machines, counting machines, measuring machines, selecting machines, cartoning machines, capping machines, piping machines, ] labeling machines, [ sealing machines, ] all for pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles [ ; microprocessors for making and assembling bottles and containers for pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles; counting machines for counting the number of articles for packaging in the field of pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetic articles; measuring machines for measuring articles for packaging in the field of pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance, repair and reconditioning of automatic machines and microprocessor based automatic machines and apparatuses, all for the packaging of pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles, and advisory and consultancy services relating thereto; maintenance, repair and reconditioning of [ filling machines, counting machines, measuring machines, selecting machines, cartoning machines, capping machines, piping machines, ] labeling machines, [ sealing machines, ] including those that are microprocessor based, all for pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles, and advisory and consultancy services relating thereto [ ; maintenance, repair and reconditioning of automatic machines and microprocessor operated automatic machines and apparatuses, all used in the making and the assembling of bottles and containers for filling with pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs and cosmetics articles, and advisory and consultancy services relating thereto ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 6, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |