Drawing for CARONLAB

USPTO serial 79099762

CARONLAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HESIK, APRIL ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARONLAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul D. Bianco

PAUL D BIANCO FLEIT GIBBONS GUTMAN BONGINI & BIANCO PL1355 E DIXIE HIGHWAYSUITE 1152MIAMI, FL 33180

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair removing preparations; depilatory preparations; depilatory products, namely, depilatory creams and pre waxed strips; depilatory waxes; epilating waxes; hair removal wax; non-medicated hair growth retardants; cosmetic wax for hair removal; before and after waxing skin lotions and creams; hair removal wax being depilatory wax; pre and post depilatory products, namely, skin creams, body oils, body lotions, pre-wax skin cleansers; cleansing preparations for use with depilatory preparations, namely, skin cleansers and facial cleansers; depilatory creams; depilatory kits comprising depilatory preparations, namely, skin cleansers and facial cleansers, depilatory waxes, wax strips for removing body hair, epilating waxes, hair removal wax, non-medicated hair growth retardants, cosmetic wax for hair removal, before and after waxing skin lotions and creams, pre and post depilatory products, namely, skin creams, body oils, body lotions, pre-wax skin cleansers, and cleansing preparations for use with depilatory preparations, namely, skin cleansers, facial cleansers, and depilatory creamsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 23, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jul 4, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
May 16, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 3, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 3, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 3, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 30, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 18, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 2, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 2, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 5, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 19, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 19, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 19, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 19, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 19, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 27, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 28, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance