Drawing for VITA CERTA

USPTO serial 79099924

VITA CERTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4223695Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 16, 2012
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITA CERTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus Stephen Harris

Merkenbureau Bouma B.V.Postbus 30177NL-3001 DD Rotterdam,NETHERLANDS

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh vegetables, fresh potatoes and fresh fruits; Edible unprocessed roots and tubers; Edible fresh, raw and unprocessed mushrooms, unprocessed fruits and unprocessed grains; Unprocessed cereals and buckwheatSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 6, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 16, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 7, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 7, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 7, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 17, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 17, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 22, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 30, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 30, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 16, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 16, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 31, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 25, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 19, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 31, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2012CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jan 13, 2012CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 8, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 8, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 6, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 30, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 29, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 28, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance