Drawing for NEMIROFF

USPTO serial 79100086

NEMIROFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4215936Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2012
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEMIROFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie B. Seyler

Julie B. Seyler Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, vodkaSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 21, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 27, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 3, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 3, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 2, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 6, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 6, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 23, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 4, 2013FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 2, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 29, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 29, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 29, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 29, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 29, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 29, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 29, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 29, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 13, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 9, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance