Drawing for KALISEL

USPTO serial 79100137

KALISEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4252000Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2012
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KALISEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirsten Grueneberg

Kirsten Grueneberg Grueneberg & Myers, PLLC5th Floor1775 Tysons BlvdTysons, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietetic products, namely, nutritional supplements for non-medical purposes, said supplements containing mineral saltSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
030Salt; [ spices; ] preservation salt for foodstuffsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 25, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 25, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 4, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 1, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 4, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 28, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 28, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 28, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 23, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 3, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 14, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 4, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 4, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 15, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 10, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 26, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2011RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 16, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 16, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 16, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 11, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 4, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance