USPTO serial 79100170
P PAKPEN PVC KAPI-PENCERE VE PANJUR SISTEMLERI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with P PAKPEN PVC KAPI-PENCERE VE PANJUR SISTEMLERI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metallic transportable buildings, prefabricated building materials, namely, wall, hardwood, decking, wood; synthetic non-metal prefabricated buildings, match boarding, namely, timber boarding; wood parquets, namely, for use as wood flooring, plywoods, chipboards; non-metallic wood, plastic doors and windows; non-metallic wood, plastic frames for doors and windows, jalousies, window brackets; Non-metal window shutters | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |