USPTO serial 79100954
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. O'Malley
John J. O'Malley VOLPE KOENIG30 South 17th StreetSuite 1800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4009| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Integrated circuits, semi-conductors, potentiometers; ] condensers, varistors, electrical resistors, thermistors, sensors, capacitors, film chip arrays and thin film chip fuses, fuses, [ computer chips, switches, resonators, electrical inductors, piezoelectric crystals ] and elements | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 3, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |