USPTO serial 79101179
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SEBA KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Tuzla - Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by SEBA KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
SEBA KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by SEBA KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
SEBA KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by SEBA KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations for laundry use; emery cloths and emery papers, abrasive paste, pumice stones for personal use; leather polishes, polishes for metallic items, furniture polishes, floor polishes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 1, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |