USPTO serial 79101386
DACELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4204081Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2012
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DACELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. StreetSuite 2200San Diego, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Load cells, namely, transducers for converting force or weight into electrical signals; material testing instruments and machines, namely, apparatuses to test the strength of materials such as cement, glass, plastic, and metal; compression testing apparatus; scales; revolution speed indicators; accelerometers; strain gauges; power transformers for amplification; power amplifiers; amplifiers; amplifying tubes; indicators, namely, apparatuses for digitally indicating output values or electrical signals received from load cells or other equipment that measures force or weight; recorded computer programs, namely, software for operating measurement machines such as load cells or materials testing instruments that test the strength of materials; torque meter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 31, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |