USPTO serial 79101441
KUMHO USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KUMHO USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Bame
JAMES E BAME IPLA PA3550 WILSHIRE BLVD17TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 91007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Fishing rod supports; landing nets for anglers; rods for fishing; fishing rod cases; fishing tackle; reels for fishing; fish hooks; fishing sinkers; fishing gaffs; artificial fishing bait; cases for fishing tackles; lines for fishing; gut for fishing; floats for fishing; fishing creels; bite indicators being fishing tackle, bite sensors being fishing tackle | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |