Drawing for BIOCEUTICALS

USPTO serial 79101496

BIOCEUTICALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOCEUTICALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia C. Archer

JULIA C. ARCHER ENNS & ARCHER LLP939 BURKE STREETWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skincare products and preparations for the skin including skin support supplements in cream form, namely, non-medicated skin creams containing a combination of one or more vitamins, herbs and minerals in an essential oil baseSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
005Pharmaceutical and medicinal preparations and substances for the treatment of adrenal conditions, allergies, respiratory dysfunction and respiratory conditions, brain and cognitive conditions, cardio-vascular conditions and dysfunction, cholesterol difficulties and conditions, children's health and developmental conditions, namely, cognitive health, liver conditions, digestive and gastro-intestinal conditions, energy difficulties, immune system disorders and conditions, joint ailments and conditions, musculoskeletal ailments and conditions, stress, anxiety, nervous system conditions and ailments, inflammatory conditions, pain, reproductive system conditions, weight and sugar management and conditions relating thereto, and for the maintenance and support of adrenal health, allergy control, respiratory health, brain and cognitive health, cardio-vascular well being, cholesterol management, children's health and development namely cognitive health, liver well being, digestive and gastrointestinal health, energy support, immune system well being, joint well being and health, musculoskeletal health, nervous system health, psychological well being, weight and sugar management; dietetic substances adapted for medical use; vitamins and vitamin supplements; dietary and nutritional products and supplements; minerals namely mineral supplements; nutritional supplements, namely, probiotic bacterial formulations for medical use; medicated preparations and products for care and treatment of the body, eyes, face, feet, hands, hair, lips, nails and skin, namely, vitamins, minerals, capsules, ointments, drops, coatings for nails, eye drops, lip balms, skin balms, herbal supplements, liquids, hair conditioners, skin creams and lotions, foot creams and lotions, oils, oils for topical applicationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
029Food preparations, namely, preparations made of milk, yoghurt, soy, whey, vegetable, fruit, dairy, fish, seafood and meat containing nutritional and dietary supplements, in crystalline, granular, solid bar and powder form; non-medicated ingredients or additives for use in food, namely, concentrated dried fruit extracts fortified with vitamins and mineralsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Sep 4, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jul 4, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 6, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 10, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 29, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Mar 2, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 13, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 29, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 29, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Oct 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 23, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 23, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 23, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 26, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 26, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 24, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 8, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance