USPTO serial 79101496
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ALEXANDRIA NSW 2015, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia C. Archer
JULIA C. ARCHER ENNS & ARCHER LLP939 BURKE STREETWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skincare products and preparations for the skin including skin support supplements in cream form, namely, non-medicated skin creams containing a combination of one or more vitamins, herbs and minerals in an essential oil base | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and medicinal preparations and substances for the treatment of adrenal conditions, allergies, respiratory dysfunction and respiratory conditions, brain and cognitive conditions, cardio-vascular conditions and dysfunction, cholesterol difficulties and conditions, children's health and developmental conditions, namely, cognitive health, liver conditions, digestive and gastro-intestinal conditions, energy difficulties, immune system disorders and conditions, joint ailments and conditions, musculoskeletal ailments and conditions, stress, anxiety, nervous system conditions and ailments, inflammatory conditions, pain, reproductive system conditions, weight and sugar management and conditions relating thereto, and for the maintenance and support of adrenal health, allergy control, respiratory health, brain and cognitive health, cardio-vascular well being, cholesterol management, children's health and development namely cognitive health, liver well being, digestive and gastrointestinal health, energy support, immune system well being, joint well being and health, musculoskeletal health, nervous system health, psychological well being, weight and sugar management; dietetic substances adapted for medical use; vitamins and vitamin supplements; dietary and nutritional products and supplements; minerals namely mineral supplements; nutritional supplements, namely, probiotic bacterial formulations for medical use; medicated preparations and products for care and treatment of the body, eyes, face, feet, hands, hair, lips, nails and skin, namely, vitamins, minerals, capsules, ointments, drops, coatings for nails, eye drops, lip balms, skin balms, herbal supplements, liquids, hair conditioners, skin creams and lotions, foot creams and lotions, oils, oils for topical application | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Food preparations, namely, preparations made of milk, yoghurt, soy, whey, vegetable, fruit, dairy, fish, seafood and meat containing nutritional and dietary supplements, in crystalline, granular, solid bar and powder form; non-medicated ingredients or additives for use in food, namely, concentrated dried fruit extracts fortified with vitamins and minerals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |