USPTO serial 79101508
KWC PIATTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KWC PIATTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Sanitary apparatus and installations, namely, faucets for showers, bathtubs, washbasins, bidets and sinks; hand sprayers and fittings for bathtubs and showers, namely, shower sprayers; components of sanitary installations, namely, valves, and mixing faucets, mixing faucets for sinks, washbasins, bidets, bathtubs and showers; supply and drainage fittings for sanitary apparatus, namely, valves for water pipes, washers for water faucets, washbasins, bidets, bathtubs and showers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 28, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |