Drawing for KLIO ETERNA

USPTO serial 79101774

KLIO ETERNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4181378Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2012
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KLIO ETERNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dionne Heard

Dionne Heard Volpe and Koenig, PC30 S. 17th Street18th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Writing, drawing and painting articles, particularly writing instruments, namely, ballpoint pens, felt-tip pens, ink pens and propelling pencils; parts of the above writing instruments, namely, propelling mechanisms, leads for ballpoint pens, pen tips for ballpoint pens, spare cartridges for felt-tip pens and ink cartridges for ink pensSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 23, 2023XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2023XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 17, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 17, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 1, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 8, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 6, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 9, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2013FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 31, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance