Drawing for XCLUSIVE CARDS

USPTO serial 79101860

XCLUSIVE CARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4219924Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2012
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XCLUSIVE CARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory J. Chinlund

GREGORY J. CHINLUND MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP6300 SEAR TOWER233 SOUTH WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Encoded magnetic credit, debit, security and key cards, all made of precious metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
036Issuing of credit cards, debit cards, security cards, key cards, all made of precious metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 8, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 28, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 31, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 31, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 10, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 10, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 7, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 30, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 30, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
May 30, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 25, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 9, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 4, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 14, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 14, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 14, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 24, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 26, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 21, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 20, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 20, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 15, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance