Drawing for GRIDBOX

USPTO serial 79101930

GRIDBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4344623Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 4, 2013
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIDBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

William C. Wright Epstein Drangel LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2410New York, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, intelligent interface electronic module directly located in the control unit of a circuit breaker and connected by optical cables to the master system of the installation on the electric current and / or other electrical equipments and intended for decoding the communication language used for the command, control and monitoring of the apparatus on the electric current, for analyzing the operational signals, for taking the decision to send alarms, reports, decisions and local or remote actions to other apparatus and instruments relating to electricity; compact intelligent self-organizing module incorporating an interactive platform of intelligent electrical and electronic devices, namely, modules monitoring of and analyzing the condition of the apparatuses; integrated computer software for data processing and analysis of equipment conditions specific for this field ; computer networking devices and communication and telecommunication equipment, namely, integrated computer based on the DNP 3 and IEC 61 850 protocols for recording, processing, sending, transmitting, transforming, extracting, switching, reproducing, storing and outputting messages, information and data for the remote operation, control, regulation, checking, surveillance, status monitoring, security, measurement or optimization of apparatus and instruments used for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating, metering or controlling electricitySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 7, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 12, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 10, 2020C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 4, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 30, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 4, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 27, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 28, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 28, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 5, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 1, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 30, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance