Drawing for CONTIFLEX

USPTO serial 79101982

CONTIFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4177605Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 24, 2012
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTIFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. McGlynn

John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestia2200 Renaissance Boulevard, Suite 350King of Prussia, PA 19406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007manufactured goods for technical purposes made of rubber and rubber substitutes, namely, conveyor belts; transmission belts not for land vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 26, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 31, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 30, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 24, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 25, 2019NC71NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 71 E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 23, 2019PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Dec 21, 2018EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2018PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Jun 25, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 1, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 2, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 26, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 26, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 24, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 8, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 8, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 17, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 27, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 27, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Sep 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 19, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 16, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance