Drawing for UNIVERSUM

USPTO serial 79102250

UNIVERSUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4676917Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 27, 2015
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with UNIVERSUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeremy S. Boczko, Esq.

Jeremy S. Boczko, Esq. Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP200 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10166United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Human resources consultation; consultation in the field of employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing in the fields of staffing, recruiting, employee retention and workforce and talent management; consulting services in the field of human resources development, namely, for the promotion of employee retention, career growth, and increased productivity for employees and employers; employment recruiting consultation; employment services, namely, providing a web site with online video, audio and textual interviewing applications to support recruiting, admissions, and general candidate screening processes; conducting employee surveys for others for purposes of improving employee performance and morale; employment staffing consultation services; providing career informationACTIVE—
042Providing access to interactive databases relating to resume creation and resume transmittals and communication of responses thereto, all through a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 15, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 14, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 15, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 23, 2022EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2022PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Feb 16, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 23, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 27, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 14, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 11, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 30, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 30, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 31, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 31, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 23, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2012CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 1, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 7, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance